This thread discusses the Content article: Superbad DVD

Wow -- I totally disagree with you about the ending! It doesn't have the boys falling for each other or contemplating a relationship with each other. It's the filmmakers poking fun at society's fear of male relationships. True, the kids are drunk and expressing themselves more openly than they normally would, but they're not in love with each other. They're not attracted to each other. They're best friends, and for once, their drunkenness is allowing them to say just how much they care about each other. They're truly freaked about leaving each other when it's time to go to college.

I thought it was really sweet.

I definitely agree that the movie is coarse and vulgar -- probably one of the most vulgar movies I've seen. (Not the most graphic, just the most vulgar.)

That said, I think it's painfully hilarious and absolutely realistic in the way it captures teenage boys. (It's not realistic in plot, but it is in characters.)

Also, as for the "idiotic cops as bad guys," really? I don't think they were bad guys at all. They were having fun. They were totally irresponsible and over the top, but they certainly weren't the bad guys. They gave McLovin the time of his life!

I agree that it was funnier than Knocked Up, and a little less lacking in heart. It still had heart, though, I think. Just look at how the "cool girl" really did maintain her individuality -- and she liked Seth even though he'd made a total fool of himself. And what about the message that Michael Cera's character emphasizes: you can't take advantage of someone, even when you really, really want what they're offering.

Mostly, though, I disagree with your claim that they're secretly gay. The whole point of that scene is to show that it's NOT gay to tell another guy you care about him.

To see it otherwise is to fulfill the stereotype they're making fun of.

Sorry.

For the most part, I agree with the reviewer of the movie. Too bad there's not an academy award for "Most Appropriately Titled".

However, I logged on to completely disagree with the reviewer's take on the ending only to find the Liz beat me to it and did a bang up job.

I think the reviewer completely misunderstood then ending. Which is sad for a number of reasons, not least of which being that it may be the only worthwhile scene in the whole movie.

Anyway, I agree with Liz.

Liz and Shack,

I haven't seen the film, so I can't comment. But I want to thank you both for doing so. One thing I love about this site is the ongoing conversation about how things strike us as we experience the arts. That we can disagree with each other in a respectful way is very encouraging to me in terms of faith and art. And that's always a good thing!

I appreciate your opinions and your willingness to share them. Thanks!

Liz: Please don't apologize for your opinion. I value it! You always express yourself with great care. It's a pleasure to read your words!

Sam